- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Zinc nutrition optimization for better cotton productivity on alkaline calcareous soil
Journal of Cotton Research volume 8, Article number: 14 (2025)
Abstract
Background
Zinc (Zn), being the most deficient micronutrient, can largely limit plant growth and development on alkaline calcareous soil. Crop species and varieties within species differently require Zn for optimum productivity. The current study aimed to optimize Zn level and mode of application for better growth, yield, and fiber quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The experimental plan comprised a control group with no Zn application, three Zn levels through soil application, i.e. 5 mg·kg−1 (SZn5), 10 mg·kg−1 (SZn10), and 15 mg·kg−1 (SZn15), two levels of foliar application including 0.5% (FZn0.5) and 1% (FZn1) Zn solution, and various combinations of soil plus foliar application. Two cotton cultivars, CIM-663 (Bt) and Cyto-124 (non-Bt) were used, and each treatment was replicated thrice.
Results
Zinc nutrition caused a significant (P ≤ 0.05) improvement in growth, yield, physiological, and fiber quality characteristics of both cotton cultivars. All levels and modes of Zn application were found effective in improving cotton productivity on alkaline calcareous soil. However, integrated soil application and foliar spray showed superiority over sole soil or foliar application. Among different treatments, SZn15 + FZn1 caused the highest improvement in most of the observed growth and yield traits. The said treatment maximally increased the leaf Zn concentration by 270.5% and 218.4% with a subsequent increase in plant height 23.2% and 28.0%, monopodial branches 40.7% and 42.1%, sympodial branches 37.2% and 35.2%, seed cotton yield 32.5% and 36.6%, and lint yield 30.0% and 34.6% in CIM-663 and Cyto-124, respectively, compared with the control. SZn15 + FZn1 also caused the highest increase in relative water contents 32.6% and 22.4%, chlorophyll contents 92.0% and 67.1%, and stomatal conductance 112.8% and 100.8% in CIM-663 and Cyto-124, respectively, compared with the control. Among the fiber quality characteristics, fiber fineness was maximally improved by 19.7% and 15.9% in CIM-663 and Cyto-124, respectively, with SZn15 + FZn1 compared with the control. Leaf Zn concentration was positively correlated with fiber length (R2 = 0.717 3), fiber strength (R2 = 0.548 3), and fiber fineness (R2 = 0.637 9) of both cotton cultivars grown with different levels and application modes of Zn. The benefit-cost ratio was remarkably improved with Zn nutrition, and the highest value of 1.64 was found in CIM-663 at SZn10 + FZn1 and SZn15 + FZn1.
Conclusion
The plant growth, physiological, yield, and fiber quality characteristics of cotton cultivars were significantly improved with Zn supply at different levels and modes of application. SZn15 + FZN1 could be recommended to get optimum seed cotton yield and fiber quality of cotton on alkaline calcareous soil.
Background
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) being a major cash crop contributes largely to global economic development and poverty alleviation (Meyer et al. 2024). It has been cultivated globally on an area of 33.55 million hectares with the production of 126.5 million bales during the year 2022–2023 (Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 2023). It is the most consumed natural fiber and contributes about 1/4th of total fibers processed in the global textile sector (Hameed et al. 2023). Cotton cultivation contributes significantly to poverty alleviation by providing subsistence to around 100 million households in 75 different countries, and 90% of these are low-income people (Voora et al. 2023). In addition, about 350 million people are involved in the process of cotton ginning, baling, transportation, and storage (Meier et al. 2021). Cotton is a major source of raw materials for the textile industry, and employs about 25 million people worldwide (Khan et al. 2020). In Pakistan, it is grown on an area of 2.42 million hectares with the production of 10.22 million bales in 2023. It contributes about 8.2% to the agriculture sector, and 3.2% to the national income of Pakistan while its share in GDP is around 10% and foreign exchange is about 60% (Pakistan Economic Survey 2024).
Pakistan occupies a prominent position in the world with respect to cotton cultivation and export (Farooq 2024). Average seed cotton yield in Pakistan is far below its potential which might be associated with inadequate plant nutrition, extreme climate, water shortage, and poor plant protection measures (Rana et al. 2020; Ashraf et al. 2024). Adequate plant nutrition is very important for the optimum growth, yield, and fiber quality of cotton because nutrients are required for all growth and yield processes, leading to higher cotton yield and fine fiber quality (Anik et al. 2023). The nutrient management strategy for cotton should comprise the regular addition of macronutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), and micronutrients including zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), and boron (B) (Ahmed et al. 2020; Abbas et al. 2021).
Zinc, a bluish-white metal, is the 23rd largest element, constituting about 0.02% of the earth’s crust (Hussain et al. 2022). Being an essential element, Zn is involved in different growth, metabolic, and reproductive phases of cotton (Anik et al. 2023). It is the structural and functional component of more than 300 enzymes that involved in various metabolic processes in cotton plants (Wang et al. 2020). Zinc is known to affect plant growth and development through its involvement in seed germination (Li et al. 2004), water relations and water use efficiency (Anik et al. 2023), osmolytes synthesis (Hatam et al. 2020), stomatal regulation (Sawar et al. 2022), chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthetic efficiency (More et al. 2018), antioxidant defense system (Cakmak 2000), protein metabolism (Sawan et al. 2001; Lacerda et al. 2018), membrane stabilization (Ghanepour et al. 2015), and reproductive development (Sadeghzadeh 2013).
The low Zn addition coupled with poor utilization efficiency, particularly on alkaline-calcareous soils, might be an important factor responsible for low cotton productivity in Pakistan and many other countries (Najafi-Ghiri et al. 2013; Kulkarni et al. 2020). The problem of poor Zn utilization efficiency can be overcome by foliar application of Zn on alkaline calcareous soils (Doolette et al. 2018). According to Ahmed et al. (2020), foliar application may be more efficient for improving cotton growth and yield on soils having high Zn adsorption capacity. However, a high evaporation rate under warm climatic conditions not only reduces the Zn utilization efficiency of foliar application but also cause its toxicity (Hussein et al. 2018). On the other hand, Hatam et al. (2020) preferred soil application over foliar spray for improving plant growth as it ensured long and continuous Zn supply. Raj et al. (2019) reported that seed treatment with Zn might be an economical and efficient method for improving the growth and yield of cotton.
Adequate regulation of Zn is critical for the optimum growth, yield, and fiber quality of cotton (Cecen et al. 2022). However, Bt and non-Bt cotton cultivars may respond differently to various levels and modes of Zn application depending upon genetic makeup, internal Zn requirements, yield potential, and environmental conditions (Abbas et al. 2020; Sarwar et al. 2021). The current study was planned to optimize the level and mode of Zn application for improving the growth, yield, and fiber quality of CIM-663 (Bt) and Cyto-124 (non-Bt) cotton cultivars under alkaline calcareous conditions. The study was based on the hypothesis that a higher level of Zn through soil addition plus foliar spray pattern would be more efficient to get better cotton productivity on alkaline calcareous soil.
Materials and methods
Description of experimental site
A pot experiment was done in the warehouse having GPS coordinates 30.10° N latitude, 71.25° E longitude, and 128.3 m altitude. During the experimental period, the minimum monthly temperature ranged from 18.5–28.3 °C while the maximum was 35.8–44.6 °C. The average monthly rainfall was 14.5–26.4 mm and evapotranspiration was 3.4–8.9 mm. The wind speed was recorded in the range of 0.79–2.69 m·s−1 and sunshine 8.4–10.6 h·d−1. The experimental soil was Loamy Hyperthermic Typic Torricalcids. The soil was collected from the cultivated field at a depth of 0–10 cm under a cotton-wheat cropping system. The soil was analyzed for various physico-chemical properties using standard procedures, and presented in Table 1.
Experimental plan
The experimental plan comprised twelve treatments, i.e., control (No Zn application); SZn5: Zn at 5 mg·kg−1 through soil application; SZn10: Zn at 10 mg·kg−1 through soil application; SZn15: Zn at 15 mg·kg−1 through soil application; FZn0.5: 0.5% Zn solution foliar spray; FZn1: 1.0% Zn solution foliar spray; SZn5 + FZn0.5: Zn at 5 mg·kg−1 through soil application plus 0.5% Zn solution foliar spray; SZn5 + FZn1: Zn at 5 mg·kg−1 through soil application plus 1% Zn solution foliar spray; SZn10 + FZn0.5: Zn at 10 mg·kg−1 through soil application plus 0.5% Zn solution foliar spray; SZn10 + FZn1: Zn at 10 mg·kg−1 through soil application plus 1% Zn solution foliar spray; SZn15 + FZn0.5: Zn at 15 mg·kg−1 through soil application plus 0.5% Zn solution foliar spray; SZn15 + FZn1: Zn at 15 mg·kg−1 through soil application plus 1% Zn solution foliar spray. Zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) was used as a Zn source. Soil application of Zn was done before sowing by incorporating the required amount of ZnSO4 according to the treatment plan. The foliar spray was made at 25 and 50 days after seedling emergence using 30 mL solution for each plant per spray. The experiment was planned according to a completely randomized design. Each treatment was replicated thrice. Each replication consisted of one pot having two plants.
Crop sowing and growth conditions
The pots were lined with polythene sheets, and 20 kg of soil was filled in each pot. Two cotton cultivars CIM-663 (Bt) and Cyto-124 (non-Bt) developed by Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan were used in the experiment. Eight seeds were sown in each pot. After two weeks of seedling emergence, plants were thinned to one plant per pot. Fertilizers were applied at N 80 mg·kg−1 as urea, P2O5 50 mg·kg−1 as single superphosphate, and K2O 50 mg·kg−1 as potassium sulfate. The whole of P2O5, K2O, and 1/3 N were added before sowing while remaining N at 30 and 60 days after seedling emergence in two equal splits. To protect the plants against different insects and pests, Novastar, Bifenthrin, Acephate, and Pyriproxyfen were sprayed after pest scouting.
Physiological characteristics
Physiological characteristics of both cotton cultivars in terms of chlorophyll contents, relative water content (RWC), and membrane stability index (MSI) were measured at 60 days after seedling emergence. Chlorophyll contents were determined using the 3rd topmost leaf of each plant in accordance with the method of Arnon (1949) using a spectrophotometer (DU730 UV–Vis Spectrophotometer, Beckman Coulter, USA). Leaf RWC was also measured using the 3rd topmost leaves of both cotton cultivars. After measuring fresh weight (FW), leaf segments were soaked in distilled water for 4 h, and reweighed to measure turgid weight (TW). After recording TW, leaf segments were air-dried and then oven-dried at 70 °C for constant weight in an oven (EYELA WFO-600ND, Tokyo Rikaikai Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) to record oven-dried weight (DW). The equation proposed by Barrs et al. (1962) was used to calculate RWC.
For the determination of MSI, the leaf was cut into small pieces and put into two sets of test tubes, each having a 100 mg leaf sample and 10 mL distilled water. One set of test tubes was heated for 30 min at 40 °C in a water bath (DIN 12876–3-K1, Memmert GmbH & Co. KG-Schwabach, Germany), and EC of suspension was measured as C1 using an EC meter (CM183EC-TDS analyzer, Elico, India). The 2nd set of test tubes was heated at 100 °C for 20 min in a water bath, and EC was recorded as C2. Following formula was used to measure MSI in accordance with Blum et al. (1981).
Gas exchange characteristics
The determination for gas exchange characteristics in terms of photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance was made on the fully expanded 4th topmost leaf of each plant using an open system portable infrared gas analyzer (CI–340 hand–held Photosynthesis meter, ADC Bioscientific, Hoddesdon, UK) during a sunny day at 10 am to 11 am.
Leaf zinc concentration
Sixty days after seedling emergence, leaf samples were collected from each plant, and washed with distilled water. The leaf samples were first air-dried and then oven-dried at 70 °C for 48 h in an oven (SLN 32, POL-EKO-APARATURA, Poland). After oven drying, leaf samples were ground to 40 mesh using a stainless steel plant grinder (MF 10 IKA–WERKE, GMBH & Co. KG, Germany). The ground leaf samples (0.5 g) were digested in a di-acid mixture of HNO3 and HClO4 (2:1, v/v) at 250 ºC using a hot plate (CE Hot Plate SH-5A/SH-5C, Faithful, China) according to the method described by Miller (1998). Zinc concentration was measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Z-8200 Polarized Zeeman AAS, Hitachi, Japan).
Growth, yield, and quality characteristics
At maturity, plant growth and yield characteristics in terms of plant height, monopodial branches per plant, and sympodial branches per plant were recorded. Plant height was measured with a meter rod while, branches were counted manually. The yield attributes including the number of bolls per plant were counted manually, boll size was measured with the help of the vernier caliper. Seed cotton yield was measured after picking while lint yield after ginning. Fiber length was measured using a Fibrograph (ASTM 1994a), fiber strength was measured by a Pressley Fiber Bundle Tester (ASTM 1994b), and fiber fineness was measured with a Micronaire Tester (ASTM 1994c).
Statistical analysis
The effect of treatments on growth, physiological, yield, and fiber quality characteristics of both cotton cultivars were determined by ANOVA on Statistics 8.1 software (IBM, USA). Treatment effectiveness was determined by means, and the differences were measured by the least significant difference test at a 5% probability level (Steel et al. 1997).
Results
Cotton productivity in terms of growth, yield, physiological, gas exchange, and fiber quality characteristics of CIM-663 and Cyto-124 were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) improved with varying levels and modes of Zn application. When comparing among different treatments, SZn15 + FZn1 maximally improved most of the observed traits of both cotton cultivars. While, application modes were ranked in order of integrated use of soil plus foliar application > soil application > foliar spray.
Physiological attributes
Physiological attributes of cotton such as chlorophyll contents, RWC, and MSI were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) improved with different levels and modes of Zn application (Table 2). Chlorophyll contents were maximally improved by 92.1% in CIM-663 and 67.1% in Cyto-124 at SZn15 + FZn1 compared with the control. The highest RWC in both cotton cultivars was found at SZn15 + FZn1. This set of treatments also increased the RWC by 32.6% in CIM-663 and 22.4% in Cyto-124 compared with the control. The membrane stability index was increased maximally by 34.5% in CIM-663 at SZn15 + FZn0.5, and 21.2% in Cyto-124 at SZn15 + FZn1 compared with the control.
Gas exchange characteristics
The highest photosynthetic rate in both cotton cultivars was observed at SZn10 + FZn1 where the improvement was 92.6% in CIM-663 and 72.0% in Cyto-124 compared with the control (Table 3). The highest transpiration rate was observed in both cotton cultivars at SZn15 + FZn1. The said set of treatments increased the transpiration rate by 69.9% in CIM-663 and 50.2% in Cyto-124 compared with the control (Table 3). The highest increase in stomatal conductance of 112.8% was observed in CIM-663 at SZn15 + FZn1 while, 100.8% in Cyto-124 at SZn10 + FZn1 compared with the control (Table 3). CIM-663 showed relatively higher photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance compared with Cyto-124 regardless of treatments.
Leaf Zn concentration
Leaf Zn concentration in both cotton cultivars was remarkably improved with all levels and modes of Zn application (Fig. 1). However, the highest improvement in leaf Zn concentration was found at 270.5% in CIM-663 and 218.4% in Cyto-124 at SZn15 + FZn1 compared with the control. Leaf Zn concentration was positively correlated with photosynthetic rate (R2 = 0.7 817).
Plant growth characterization
Plant growth characteristics of both cotton cultivars in terms of plant height, monopodial branches, and sympodial branches were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) improved by Zn nutrition. In both cultivars, SZn15 + FZn1 produced the tallest plants. It increased the plant height by 23.2% in CIM-663 and 28.0% in Cyto-124 compared with the control (Fig. 2). The highest sympodial branches per plant were also found in both cultivars at SZn15 + FZn1 where the increase was 37.2% in CIM-663 and 35.2% in Cyto-124 compared with the control (Fig. 3). Likewise, monopodial branches per plant were maximally increased in both cultivars at SZn15 + FZn1 where the increase was 40.7% in CIM-663 and 42.1% in Cyto-124 compared with the control (Fig. 4).
Yield characteristics
Seed cotton yield and yield characteristics such as boll size and the number of bolls per plant were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) improved with Zn nutrition. The highest increase in seed cotton yield was found at SZn15 + FZn1 where the increase was 32.5% in CIM-663 and 36.6% in Cyto-124 compared with the control (Fig. 5). Lint yield was maximally increased by 30.0% in CIM-663 and 34.6% in Cyto-124 at SZn15 + FZn1 compared with the control (Fig. 6). The highest number of bolls per plant were observed at SZn15 + FZn0.5 where the increase was 34.3% in CIM-663 and 29.4% in Cyto-124 compared with the control (Fig. 7). Boll size was maximally increased at SZn15 + FZn0.5 where the increase was 31.4% in CIM-663 and 29.6% in Cyto-124 compared with the control (Fig. 8). When comparing among the cultivars, CIM-663 produced relatively higher seed cotton yield and yield characteristics compared with Cyto-124, regardless of the treatments.
Fiber quality characteristics
Fiber quality characteristics in terms of fiber length, strength, and fineness were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected by Zn nutrition (Table 4). The treatment SZn15 + FZn1 proved the most efficient in improving the fiber quality of both cultivars under alkaline calcareous conditions. It was found that fiber length was maximally increased by 14.2% in CIM-663 at SZn15 + FZn1, and 9.9% in Cyto-124 at SZn10 + FZn1 compared with the control. The highest increase in fiber strength was 11.9% in CIM-663 and 10.4% in Cyto-124 at SZn10 + FZn1 compared with the control. Fiber fineness was maximally increased in both cotton cultivars at SZn15 + FZn1 where the increase was 19.7% in CIM-663 and 15.9% in Cyto-124 compared with the control. There was a positive correlation between leaf Zn concentration and fiber quality characteristics in terms of fiber length (R2 = 0.717 3), fiber strength (R2 = 0.548 3), and fiber fineness (R2 = 0.637 9) in both cotton cultivars grown at different levels and modes of Zn application under alkaline calcareous conditions.
Benefit-cost ratio
The benefit-cost ratio varied greatly for both cotton cultivars grown at different levels and application modes of Zn under alkaline calcareous conditions. It ranged from 1.51 to 1.64 for CIM-663 while, 1.09 to 1.21 for Cyto-124. The highest benefit-cost ratio was 1.64 for CIM-663 at SZn10 + FZn1 and SZn15 + FZn1, and 1.21 for Cyto-164 at SZn10 + FZn0.5, respectively (Table 5).
Discussion
Zinc-mediated improvement in physiological and gas exchange characteristics of both cotton cultivars CIM-663 and Cyto-124 was attributed to its involvement in the synthesis of chlorophyll, stabilization of cell membrane, and higher water retention in plants. Zinc being the important constituent of chloroplast could improve chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis as evidenced by a positive correlation between leaf Zn concentration and photosynthetic rate (Lacerda et al. 2018; More et al. 2018; Hassan et al. 2020). Improvement in RWC and MSI at various levels of Zn supply was associated with its role in the development and functionality of vascular tissues, stomatal regulation, and metabolic activities (Hatam et al. 2020; Sarwar et al. 2022). Anik et al. (2023) reported that Zn-induced improvement in chlorophyll synthesis, photosynthesis, plant water status, membrane stabilization, and enzymatic activities could be the primary mechanisms for improving cotton growth and yield, particularly under drought stress. The combined use of soil addition and foliar spray ensured a quick and persistent Zn supply to plants, leading to higher improvement in the physiological and gas exchange characteristics of cotton cultivars. Nayak et al. (2023) also found that the combined use of soil addition and foliar spray of Zn could more efficiently improve wheat growth, yield, and physiological characteristics compared with the individual use either through soil addition or foliar spray.
The improvement in leaf Zn concentration of both cotton cultivars at different levels of Zn supply was associated with adequate Zn replenishment through soil addition and foliar spray. The highest leaf Zn concentration with the combined use of soil and foliar application was linked to quick Zn supply by foliar spray and consistent availability by soil application (Zhao et al. 2020). In the present study, alkaline soil pH, low organic matter, and high calcium carbonate contents were the major factors to restrict the solubility and bioavailability of Zn in soil, resulting in low leaf Zn concentration. It could be overcome by foliar application avoiding Zn precipitation in soil (Ahmed et al. 2022). However, due to hot and arid climatic conditions, water evaporated quickly to reduce the absorption of foliar spray of Zn. It necessitated the combined application of soil addition and foliar spray as a promising option to attain adequate Zn concentration in plant tissues (Khalid et al. 2022).
Zinc-mediated improvement in plant growth and yield characteristics of both cotton cultivars might be attributed to its role in chlorophyll synthesis, photosynthetic activities, stomatal conductance, membrane stabilization, and plant water status (Hatam et al. 2020; Anik et al. 2023). Current study found that adequate Zn nutrition through soil addition and foliar spray improved photosynthesis and other physiological characteristics, leading to an increase in plant height, the number of sympodial branches and monopodial branches per plant. Sakya et al. (2018) reported that Zn increased plant leaf area which resulted in a higher photosynthetic rate, and improvement in growth characteristics. Zinc might help to improve the translocation of photosynthates from leaves to bolls, resulting in bolls with higher size, and subsequently higher seed cotton yield (Abbas et al. 2020).
The improvement in fiber quality characteristics of cotton in terms of fiber length, strength. and fineness at adequate Zn supply was attributed to its role in physiological and reproductive development. According to Raj et al. (2019), Zn-induced mechanisms responsible for improving fiber quality of cotton might include improved photosynthesis, fertilization, flower, and boll setting as well as mobilization of photosynthates from leaves to bolls. However, genetic makeup and environmental conditions could also be important to control fiber quality of cotton (Grimes et al. 1990). The combined use of soil addition and foliar spray ensured adequate Zn concentration in plant tissues required for fiber maturity, resulting in long and strong fiber (Mehran et al. 2023). It was confirmed by a positive correlation between leaf Zn concentration and fiber quality characteristics of both cotton cultivars.
Cotton is grown in many countries of the world for fiber, oil, and feed. Being an important cash crop, it can play a vital role in employment generation and poverty alleviation. Recent changes in climate have made the cotton crop more vulnerable to different abiotic and biotic stress factors and necessitate the development of plant tolerance mechanisms against stress conditions. In this regard, adequate plant nutrition, particularly with micronutrients can provide a promising strategy for improving plant tolerance/resistance to stress conditions. Zinc is the most widespread deficient microelement under alkaline calcareous conditions, and there is a dire need to regulate its supply for optimum plant growth and development. The current research suggested valuable recommendations regarding the adequate level and application mode of Zn for optimum growth, physiological, yield, and fiber quality characteristics of Bt and non-Bt cotton cultivars under alkaline calcareous conditions. These findings could strategically direct future planning in plant nutrition and soil fertility development for cotton. An understanding of total soil Zn distribution into different fractions under alkaline calcareous conditions is a key factor in determining Zn solubility and phytoavailability. Future research should, therefore, be based on the determination of different Zn fractions in soil and the effect of Zn application at different growth stages on the productivity of Bt and non-Bt cotton cultivars.
Conclusions
The plant growth, physiological, yield, and fiber quality characteristics of cotton cultivars were significantly improved with Zn supply at different levels and modes of application. However, SZn15 + FZn1 maximally improved most of the observed growth, yield, and fiber quality traits under alkaline calcareous conditions. Zinc-mediated increases in chlorophyll synthesis, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and boll development were the major factors responsible for improving cotton growth and yield. SZn15 + FZn1 could be recommended for optimum cotton productivity under alkaline calcareous conditions. However, these results need to be verified under field conditions.
Data availability
Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Abbas Z, Mehdi SM, Nasir M, et al. Role of zinc in enhancing the yield and quality of Bt. cotton in Bahawalpur division. Interciencia J. 2020;45(1):310–8.
Abbas Z, Abbas G, Hussain J, et al. Foliar application of macro and micronutrients enhances cotton production. J Environ Agric Sci. 2021;23(3 & 4):1–7.
Ahmed N, Hussain HZ, Ali MA, et al. Effect of zinc on chlorophyll contents, gas exchange attributes and zinc concentration in rice. Pak J Bot. 2022;54(1):17–24. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.30848/PJB2022-1(14).
Ahmed N, Ali MA, Hussain S, et al. Essential micronutrients for cotton production. In: Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M, editors. Cotton production and uses. Singapore: Springer; 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_7.
Anik TR, Mostofa MG, Rahman MM, et al. Zn supplementation mitigates drought effects on cotton by improving photosynthetic performance and antioxidant defense mechanisms. Antioxidants. 2023;12:854. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/antiox12040854.
Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949;24:1–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1104/pp.24.1.1.
Ashraf S, Ch KM, Ashraf I, et al. A phenomenological inquiry into farmers’ experiences growing cotton in Punjab, Pakistan. Sci Rep. 2024;14:13846. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41598-024-62950-y.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test method for fiber length and length distribution of cotton fibers. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Philadelphia: ASTM; 1994a. p. 753–6.
ASTM. Standard test methods for measurement of cotton fibers by high volume instruments (HVI). Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Philadelphia: ASTM; 1994b. p. 486–94.
ASTM. Standard test method for breaking strength and elongation of fibers (flat bundle method). Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Philadelphia: ASTM; 1994c. p. 392–7.
Barrs HD, Weatherley PE. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci. 1962;15:413–28.
Bigham JM. Influence of pH on mineral speciation in a bioreactor simulating acid mine drainage. Appl Geochem. 1996;11:845–9.
Black CA, Evans DD, White JL, et al. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy;1965.
Blum A, Ebercon A. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci. 1981;21:43–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100010013x.
Cakmak I. Tansley Review No. 111 – possible roles of zinc in protecting plant cell from damage by reactive oxygen species. New Phytol. 2000;146:185–205. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00630.x.
Cecen V, Karademir E. Effect of Zinc application methods on nutrition uptake in cotton. J Agron Technol Eng Manag. 2022;5(4):769–78. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.55817/ZNYS9774.
Doolette CL, Read TL, Li C, et al. Foliar application of zinc sulphate and zinc EDTA to wheat leaves: differences in mobility, distribution, and speciation. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(18):4469–81. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/jxb/ery236.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). World food and agriculture – statistical yearbook 2023. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2023. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4060/cc8166en.
Farooq W. Cotton and products update. Report No. PK2024–0009. Washington, USA: Foreign Agricultural Service, United States Department of Agriculture; 2024. p. 1–6.
Gee GW, Bauder JW. Particle-size analysis. In: Page A, Klute A, editors. Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. physical and mineralogical methods. Wisconsin, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America; 1986. p. 383–411.
Ghanepour S, Shakiba MR, Toorchi M, et al. Role of Zn nutrition in membrane stability, leaf hydration status, and growth of common bean grown under soil moisture stress. J Biodivers Environ Sci. 2015;6:9–20.
Grimes DW, El-Zik KM. Cotton. In: Stewart BA, Nielsen DR, editors. Irrigation of agricultural crops. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America; 1990.
Hameed A, Islam M, Qayyum A, et al. Optimizing cotton productivity: a comprehensive analysis of categorizing factor levels. J Pure Appl Agric. 2023;8(3):34–41.
Hassan U, Aamer M, Chattha MU, et al. The critical role of zinc in plants facing the drought stress. Agriculture. 2020;10(9):396. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/agriculture10090396.
Hatam Z, Sabet MS, Malakouti MJ, et al. Zinc and potassium fertilizer recommendation for cotton seedlings under salinity stress based on gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence responses. S Afr J Bot. 2020;130:155–64. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.sajb.2019.11.032.
Hussain S, Khan M, Sheikh TMM, et al. Zinc essentiality, toxicity, and its bacterial bioremediation: a comprehensive insight. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:900740. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2022.900740.
Hussein MM, Abou-Baker NH. The contribution of nano-zinc to alleviate salinity stress on cotton plants. Royal Soc Open Sci. 2018;5:171809. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rsos.171809.
Khalid S, Amanullah, Ahmed I. Enhancing zinc biofortification of wheat through integration of zinc, compost, and zinc-solubilizing bacteria. Agriculture. 2022;12:968. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/agriculture12070968 .
Khan MA, Wahid A, Ahmad M, et al. World cotton production and consumption: an overview. In: Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M, editors. Cotton production and uses. Singapore: Springer; 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_1.
Kulkarni S, Ravi MV, Narayana RK, et al. Physico-chemical properties and distribution of nutrients in different type of calcareous vertisols. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(1):30–3. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i1a.8304.
Lacerda JS, Martinez HEP, Pedrosa AW, et al. Importance of zinc for arabica coffee and its effects on the chemical composition of raw grain and beverage quality. Crop Sci. 2018;58(3):1360–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2135/cropsci2017.06.0373.
Li LL, Ma ZB, Wang WL, et al. Effect of spraying nitrogen and zinc at seedling stage on some physiological characteristics and yield of summer cotton. J Henan Agric Univ. 2004;38:33–5.
Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978;42(3):421–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x.
Mehran M, Ashraf M, Shahzad SM, et al. Growth, yield and fiber quality characteristics of Bt and non-Bt cotton cultivars in response to boron nutrition. J Cotton Res. 2023;6:1. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s42397-023-00138.
Meier C, Sampson G, Larrea C, et al. The state of sustainable markets 2021: statistics and emerging trends. Geneva: International Trade Centre, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture; 2021.
Meyer L, Dew T. Economic research service-situation and outlook report. Washington, USA: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture; 2024. p. 1–10.
Miller RO. Nitric-perchloric wet acid digestion in an open vessel. In: Kalra YP, editor. Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. Washington, USA: CRC Press; 1998. p. 57–62.
More VR, Khargkharate VK, Yelvikar NV, et al. Effect of boron and zinc on growth and yield of Bt. cotton under rainfed condition. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2018;6(4):566–70.
Najafi-Ghiri M, Ghasemi-Fasaei R, Farrokhnejad E. Factors affecting micronutrient availability in calcareous soils of Southern Iran. Arid Land Res Manag. 2013;27(3):203–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/15324982.2012.719570.
Nayak S, Shivay YS, Prasanna R, et al. Soil and foliar application of Zn enhances its biofortification, bioavailability and productivity in both biofortified and non-biofortified wheat varieties. J Food Compos Anal. 2023;124:105691.
Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Total carbon, nitrogen and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors. Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Madison, USA: Chemical and Microbial Properties, American Society of Agronomy; 1982. p. 539–79.
Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, et al. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington, USA: United States Department of Agriculture; 1954.
Pakistan Economic Survey. Pakistan Economic Survey 2023–24: Agriculture. Islamabad, Pakistan: Economic’s Advisor Wing, Finance Division, Govt. of Pakistan; 2024. p. 21–40.
Raj NP, Chandrashekara CP. Nano zinc seed treatment and foliar application on growth, yield and economics of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(8):1624–30. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.808.192.
Rana AW, Ejaz A, Shikoh SH. Cotton crop: A situational analysis of Pakistan. Washington, USA: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2499/p15738coll2.133702.
Richards LA. Improvement and management of soils in arid and semi-arid regions in relation to salinity and alkalinity. In: Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Washington, USA: United States Department of Agriculture; 1953. p. 34–54.
Sadeghzadeh B. A review of zinc nutrition and plant breeding. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2013;13:905–27. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4067/S0718-95162013005000072.
Sakya AT, Sulistyaningsih E, Indradewa D, et al. Stomata character and chlorophyll content of tomato in response to Zn application under drought condition. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2018;142:012033. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1088/1755-1315/142/1/012033.
Sarwar M, Saleem MF, Ali B, et al. Application of potassium, zinc and boron as potential plant growth modulators in Gossypium hirsutum L. under heat stress. Turk J Agric For. 2022;46(4):13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.55730/1300-011X.3026.
Sarwar G, Nazir A, Rizwan M, et al. Genetic diversity among cotton genotypes for earliness, yield and fiber quality traits using correlation, principal component and cluster analyses. Sarhad J Agric. 2021;37(1):307–14.
Sawan ZM, Hafez SA, Basyony AE. Effect of phosphorus fertilization and foliar application of chelated zinc and calcium on seed, protein and oil yields and oil properties of cotton. J Agric Sci. 2001;136:191–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1017/S0021859601008644.
Soltanpour PM, Worker S. Modification of the NH4HCO3-DTPA soil test to omit carbon black. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1979;10:1411–20.
Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey D. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. New York, USA: McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc.; 1997. p. 666.
Thomas GW. Exchangeable cations (potassium chloride method). In: Page AL, editor. Methods of soil analysis: part 2 chemical and microbiological properties. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America; 1982. p. 159−65. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c9.
Voora V, Bermudez S, Farrell JJ, et al. Global market report: cotton prices and sustainability. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2023. https://www.iisd.org/publications/report/2023-global-market-report-cotton. Accessed 8 Mar 2024.
Wang M, Kong F, Liu R, et al. Zinc in wheat grain, processing, and food. Front Nutr. 2020;7:124. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fnut.2020.00124.
Wilcox LV. A method for calculating the saturation percentage from the weight of a known volume of saturated soil paste. Soil Sci. 1951;72:233–8.
Zhao A, Wang B, Tian X, et al. Combined soil and foliar ZnSO4 application improves wheat grain Zn concentration and Zn fractions in a calcareous soil. Eur J Soil Sci. 2020;71(4):681–94. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/ejss.12903.
Acknowledgements
Authors are grateful to the Department of Soil Science, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan for providing research and analytical facilities. We are also thankful to Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan for providing seeds of two cotton cultivars.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ashraf M. and Qamar F designed and executed the experiment, and wrote the manuscript. Mehran M and Masood S helped in the execution of experiment. Shahzad SM, Javed MS, and Azhar MT helped in analytical work and manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
None of the authors have any conflict of interest. Author Azhar MT is a member of the Editorial Board of Journal of Cotton Research. Author Azhar MT was not involved in the journal’s review of, or decision related to this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ashraf, M., Qamar, F., Mehran, M. et al. Zinc nutrition optimization for better cotton productivity on alkaline calcareous soil. J Cotton Res 8, 14 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s42397-025-00218-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s42397-025-00218-0